Selenium 3:
Main Features of Selenium 3:
-
Strong support for Firefox, Chrome, Internet Explorer, Safari, etc.
-
Introduced WebDriver as the main tool for writing automation scripts.
- Provided better synchronization tools to handle wait times and element loading.
- Used the JSON Wire Protocol for browser communication.
-
Stable and widely adopted in the testing community.
Limitations of Selenium 3:
-
Not fully aligned with modern web standards.
-
Some features, like debugging and parallel testing, were harder to implement.
- The Selenium Grid was harder to set up and use.
Selenium 4:
Key Upgrades in Selenium 4:
-
W3C Standard Support: Selenium 4 supports the W3C WebDriver protocol, which means tests run more consistently across different browsers.
-
Better Selenium Grid: The new Grid is easier to use, supports Docker, and is more scalable.
- Improved Debugging Tools: It is easier to take screenshots, view logs, and troubleshoot errors.
- New Features in Selenium IDE: Record and playback features are stronger and support control flow commands like if-else and loops.
-
Improved User Interface: The UI is cleaner and more user-friendly, helping testers work faster.
Why This Matters:
-
Tests are more stable.
-
Works better across all modern browsers.
- Reduces compatibility problems.
Selenium Grid: Old vs. New
-
Selenium 3 Grid: Difficult to configure. Required more manual setup.
-
Selenium 4 Grid: Easier to install and use. Supports Docker for easy container-based testing. Also supports running multiple tests in parallel more efficiently.
Selenium IDE Enhancements:
-
It has a better interface.
-
Allows test recording and export to many programming languages.
- Supports control flow-like conditions and loops.
Debugging Made Easier:
-
Capture screenshots at every step of the test.
-
View browser logs.
- Identify bugs quickly and fix them faster.
Scripting Enhancements in Selenium 4:
-
Supports new ways to find elements (locators).
-
Works better with modern web frameworks like React and Angular.
- Lets testers write smarter, shorter, and more reliable scripts.
Cross-Browser Testing:
-
Tests behave the same on Chrome, Firefox, Edge, etc.
-
Less time is needed to fix browser-specific issues.
Backward Compatibility:
-
You don’t have to rewrite all your tests.
-
You can slowly move your projects to Selenium 4 without breaking anything.
Real-World Use Cases:
Which One Should You Choose?
-
Choose Selenium 3 if you are working on an older project and don’t need the new features.
-
Choose Selenium 4 if you want better performance, easier setup, and more support for modern websites.
Final Thoughts:
Let Sparkle Web Help You Upgrade
Get in touch with us to explore how we can help you move forward with smarter, future-ready testing tools.
Sumit Patil
A highly skilled Quality Analyst Developer. Committed to delivering efficient, high-quality solutions by simplifying complex projects with technical expertise and innovative thinking.
Reply